|
|
Legal Program
|
Friday, September 9, 2011, 11:22 pm |
|
Pulaski County
pays more than $230,000 to the ACLU of Kentucky
Louisville, KY – Today Pulaski County
officials paid more than $230,000 to the ACLU of Kentucky for legal fees
incurred by the civil rights organization in challenging the County’s posting
of three separate Ten Commandments displays in its courthouse.
In addressing today’s payment, ACLU of Kentucky attorney William
Sharp stated, “It is unfortunate that despite having lost before every court to
consider this case, county officials nonetheless prolonged this litigation for
more than a decade thereby increasing the financial burden on taxpayers.” Sharp added, “This case reaffirms that
government officials may not use public office to promote a religious agenda,
and failure to abide by that basic constitutional limitation on governmental
authority can be costly.”
“The
ACLU of Ky. recognizes that many people feel strongly about this issue because
it touches upon one of the most fundamental facets of one’s own identity —
their religious beliefs,” explained ACLU of Kentucky Executive Director Michael
Aldridge, “but ours is a limited form of government that lacks authority to
promote a particular religion, even if that religion is shared by most
people. When courts reaffirm that
principle, even when the decision is unpopular, it is a victory for everyone’s
religious freedom.”
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Thursday, May 19, 2011, 11:00 am |
|
By Bill Estep —
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
SOMERSET — The legal bill continues to mount for two
south-central Kentucky counties from their lengthy, unsuccessful fight to post
copies of the Ten Commandments in their courthouses.
This week, U.S. District Judge Jennifer Coffman awarded an
additional $23,366 in attorney fees and costs to the American Civil Liberties
Union of Kentucky for its work in challenging the displays, which were ruled
unconstitutional.
Pulaski and McCreary counties now owe the ACLU a total of
$456,881, nearly all of it for attorney fees. That figure doesn't include
mounting interest.
Read the full Herald Leader story here .
|
|
|
Wednesday, March 30, 2011, 3:56 pm |
|
In two pending cases
before the Kentucky Court of Appeals, the state is 1) defending its right to
credit Almighty God for its safety and security and 2) opposing the right of a
strict Amish group to rely on God for their safety, rather than a bright
triangle as they travel public roadways in their horse-drawn buggies.
These cases are more complicated than that, but the
similarities are striking. In both cases, Attorney General Jack Conway’s office
is on one side and the American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky is on the
other.
Read the full Courier Journal story here .
|
|
|
Friday, March 25, 2011, 2:00 pm |
cloudsoup "Amish Alert". 2006. Online Image. Flickr.
A lawyer for nine Western
Kentucky Amish men said the constitutional right to religious liberty should
protect their refusal to put state-mandated bright safety emblems on their
horse-drawn buggies.
“This case is about the right of
Kentuckians to freely exercise their religious beliefs and by necessity the
limits of government's ability to impose a substantial burden on that right,”said William Sharp of the American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky.
Read the whole Courier Journal article here.
|
|
|
Monday, March 21, 2011, 10:26 am |
 In 2007 John M. Berry Jr. disagreed with the ethics commission after they had dismissed a complaint against Kentucky Senate President David Williams for soliciting campaign money from Frankfort lobbyists. Berry sent a letter to the ethics commissioners, claiming they failed in their duty. He went on to attend their next meeting and provided his letter to journalists. Berry's claim was met with a complaint filed with the Kentucky Bar Association by ethics commissioner, Paul Gudgel, a retired state Court of Appeals chief judge. Following Gudgel's complaint, the KBA launched an professional conduct investigation of Berry and after 15 months, the KBA Inquiry Commission dismissed Gudgel's complaint but it still sent Berry a warning letter. Berry responded by suing the KBA, citing the First Amendment. He asked the ACLU of Ky to represent him. "The bottom line on our position is that the contents of Mr. Berry's letter are protected speech, and to the extent that they want torestrict his comments, the KBA's warning is chilling," said ACLU staff attorney William Sharp. "Attorneys should be able, just like the rest of society, to provide insightful criticisms into governmental operations. If they cannot, all of us lose." Read the full Herald Leader story here. Read Berry's full letter here. Read the ACLU of Ky's support for summary judgment. Read the KBA's summary judgment here. |
|
| | << Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>
| | Results 1 - 9 of 15 |
|
Archive
-
September, 2011
-
August, 2011
-
April, 2011
-
March, 2011
-
February, 2011
-
January, 2011
-
November, 2010
-
September, 2010
-
August, 2010
-
June, 2010
-
April, 2010
-
March, 2010
-
February, 2010
-
January, 2010
-
December, 2009
-
October, 2009
-
September, 2009
-
August, 2009
-
June, 2009
-
May, 2009
-
April, 2009
-
March, 2009
-
January, 2009
-
November, 2008
-
October, 2008
-
July, 2008
-
June, 2008
-
May, 2008
-
April, 2008
-
March, 2008
|